Kamala Harris is finally doing a solo interview with a national reporter — and surprise! It's with MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle.
This is the same journalist who publicly said on Friday that Harris should not give any interviews to the American people.
There is no real information about how she would govern if elected.
He debated New York Times columnist Bret Stephens on “Real Time with Bill Maher” and defended Harris, saying she was avoiding real media scrutiny because “Kamala Harris is not running for perfection,” Ruhle said.
“She's running against Trump. We have two choices. And so there are some things you may not know the answer to. And in 2024, unlike 2016, for many Americans, we know exactly what Trump will do, who he is and what kind of threat he poses to democracy.”
And with these statements, Ruhle revealed that she is a high-ranking member of #Khiv.
Ruhle declared himself a journalist against journalism, suggesting to Harris that it was easier to sit in the seat across from him.
This is pathetic and embarrassing for both Ruhle and Harris and should be a huge red flag for undecided voters.
Harris only goes where the water is warm.
She only talks to friendly faces who don't pressure her into spontaneous political changes, like the fact that she's a left-wing senator who vows to ban fracking and supports gender reassignment for federal prisoners, and has become a supporter of the working class.
Harris isn’t ready to be tested — and his team, combined with guys like Ruhle, is giving him the protection of an elite offensive line.
Sure this bubble wrap strategy is great for selling “Brat” and “Joey” merch, but it won't instill confidence when he has to do real work, especially as conflicts in the Middle East continue to escalate.
How can it compete with Putin or China's Xi Jinping or other hostile powers when it is unwilling to answer tough questions?
She is so uncomfortable and out of her depth that she is even avoiding the Al Smith Dinner, which is intended to showcase the candidates' humor, humanity and their ability to endure and serve up some healthy sarcasm. She is, as Cardinal Dolan ominously noted yesterday, the first presidential candidate to skip it since Walter Mondale in 1984.
Last week, CNN's Brian Stelter assured us that “if you look closely, Kamala Harris is doing more press interviews.” Said what?
In the article, their spokesperson Ian Sams described this strategy as progressive and visionary. They are not bowing to tradition, but reinventing themselves for the changing media landscape.
Harris “is going where people get their news, and everywhere she is taking questions — often tough questions — about her plans and agenda.”
If she's meeting the people where she gets her news from, why do we have to “keep a close eye” on all this?
So far, she and Tim Walz have sat down for a pretaped softball chat with CNN's Dana Bash, where Bash couldn't wipe the smile off her face. Harris did this An interview with a local ABC affiliateA friendly NABJ panel and, of course, his live stream Pep Rally with Oprah Winfrey,
This is the same special in which Oprah introduced Harris in a long, cryptic voice that sounded like Michael Buffer introducing Hulk Hogan to the ring.
while working-class heroines Julia Roberts and Jennifer Lopez cheered them on.
Even journalists at the DNC complained that they were forced to produce “Yaas Queen” content by influential people there.
Meanwhile, Harris was not asked about her border record or economic policies and continued to behave as if she is not part of the current administration and its problems.
As for Ruhle, he has shown utter disdain for his audience, saying they don't deserve an answer. The peasants will eat what they are served.
During the Trump administration, Ruhle Regularly tweeting demands for “transparency”“On a lot of issues, but when it comes to Harris, less is more. Because she knows Harris is vulnerable and needs help.”
Ruhle's is a venerable establishment that ridicules working people who actually want to vote based on kitchen issues.
I have many problems with Trump, particularly his lack of discipline, but none of them involve his willingness to engage with people, whether friend or foe. He and J.D. Vance sit down for long conversations with podcasters and reporters. They have held press conferences. And Vance is a regular on Sunday morning shows.
And then there's Harris, who, by avoiding invasive interviews, has shown us all we need to know.
